Guardian honored for investigation of buying influence at City Hall


Bay Guardian News Editor Rebecca Bowe and Staff Writer Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez are being honored by the Society of Professional Journalists with a James Madison Freedom of Information Award for “Friends in the Shadows,” our investigation of the shady ways that developers and other powerful players buy influence at City Hall.

The package of articles, prepared for the Guardian’s 47th anniversary issue of Oct. 6, used extensive public records to show how contributions to the city’s various “Friends Of...” organizations create cozy relationships between regulators and the regulated, donations that are often designed to skirt public disclosure requirements.

“Their detailed and thorough account explored a trail of money through myriad city agencies and departments,” the awards committee wrote, noting how the paper “used public records, interviews and independent research to probe how developers, corporations and city contractors use indirect gifts to city agencies to buy influence.”

The Guardian will profile the other winners in our annual Freedom of Information Issue on March 12, and all the winners will be honored at SPJ’s James Madison Awards banquet on March 20.  The full press release follows:  







SAN FRANCISCO - Retired San Francisco Chronicle editor Peter Sussman, known for histireless pursuit of an end to restrictions on media access to prisoners, his support of the inmate journalists’ rights, and for his many other contributions to journalism, has been named winner of the Norwin S. Yoffie Award for Career Achievement Award by the Society of Professional Journalists Northern California chapter.


Sussman will be honored along with other winners of the chapters’ James Madison Freedom of Information Awards on Thursday, March 20 in San Francisco. Other winners include three high school journalists who honored confidential agreements with sources by beating back a subpoena for their notes, an online newspaper that successfully sued for its right to basic law enforcement information after being blacklisted by a county sheriff it had angered by reporting on his past, and an investigative journalist who used more than 100,000 pages of documents to report on potential structural problems on the new eastern span of the Bay Bridge.


The 29th Annual James Madison Awards will be presented to champions of the First Amendment and freedom of information on Thursday, March 20, 2014, at a banquet at the San Francisco City Club.


Besides Sussman, whose award is named for the late editor of the San Rafael Independent Journal and co-founder of the SPJ NorCal’s Freedom of Information Committee who was a staunch advocate for transparency, the honorees are:


•      Rob Gunnison, a former instructor and Director of School Affairs at UC Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism will be honored with the Beverly Kees Educator Award for his years of mentoring aspiring journalists and for the re-establishment of required course work on access to public records. The award is named for a former SPJ NorCal president who was an educator and nationally recognized journalist.


•      In a year when whistleblowers have been both applauded and excoriated, Peter Buxton will be honored with the FOI Whistleblower/Source Awardfor his historic 1972 role in exposing to a reporter the evils of the Tuskegee syphilis experiments. From 1932 to 1972 African-American sharecroppers who thought they were getting medical care went untreated for syphilis so the government could study the disease’s progression.   


•      State Senator Leland Yee of San Francisco will receive the Public Official recognition award for his courage to oppose his own Democratic Party leaders and the governor in 2013 with public criticism of efforts to weaken the California Public Records Act by loosening disclosure requirements for local governments.


•      The Lake County News and its co-foundersElizabeth Larson and John Jensen will receive theNews Media Award, for their successful legal fight to force the county sheriff to end a news blacklist of the paper after a series of hard-hitting, critical articles about his conduct in office. 


•      Attorney Terry Gross of Gross Belsky Alonso, will receive the FOI Legal Counsel Award in recognition of his years of work to expand the rights of online journalists and to protect reporters who were victims of corporate email snooping and to redress the illegal police detention of reporters during protests in Oakland and Berkeley, among many causes.


•      Freelance journalist Richard Knee will receive a Distinguished Service Award for 12 years of service on San Francisco’s Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, an 11-member body that monitors City Hall’s compliance with open-government laws. He has served two decades on the SPJ NorCal FOI Committee and he helped in a successful ballot-measure campaign to strengthen the Sunshine law in 1998-99.


•      Reporter Tom Vacar of KTVU Channel 2 will receive a Journalist Award for his story exposing false claims by BART and BART unions that the California Public Utilities Commission certifies BART train operators. Using the California Public Records Act, Vacar forced the CPUC to disclose it does not certify, review, test or train operators, but is no more than a rubber stamp for BART operator certification. 


•      The San Quentin News will be honored with aNews Media Award for accomplishing extraordinary journalism under extraordinary circumstances. In the only inmate-produced paper in California, and under the scrutiny of prison authorities, the inmate journalists and volunteers covered a prison hunger strike, overcrowding and denial of compassionate release for a dying inmate.


•      Samuel Liu, Sabrina Chen and Cristina Curcelli, reporters at The Saratoga Falcon, at Saratoga High School, will receive the Student Journalist—High School Award for their resistance to subpoenas for their notes and for protecting their sources by invoking California’s reporter shield law as they covered cyberbullying claims and the suicide of a classmate.  


•      Judith Liteky, a former nun, and Theresa Cameranesi, will receive the Citizen Award, for pressing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Defense to win a precedent-setting ruling that the government may not withhold on national security grounds the names and military unit information of graduates and instructors at the former School of the Americas, now known as the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation. 


•      News Editor Rebecca Bowe and staff writerJoe Fitzgerald Rodriguez of the San Francisco Bay Guardian will receive Journalist Awards for extensive use of public records, independent research and interviews to produce a detailed account of financial “gifts” given to some city agencies that are used to curry favor out of the limelight.


•      Aaron Swartz, a computer programmer who launched a method of secure communication between journalists and their sources, will be honored posthumously with the Public Service Award.  Swartz died in January 2013 at the age of 26, but his work on the journalist-source software 'Strongbox' has flourished.


•      Senior investigative reporter Charles Piller ofThe Sacramento Bee will be honored with theJournalist Award for breaking the story that the tendons connecting the skyway portion of the new eastern span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge were corroded and could potentially fail. His digging led to the revelation that engineers had warned for two years of the danger.


•      Columnist and editorial writer Daniel Borenstein of the Bay Area News Group will receive the Editorial & Commentary Award for his strong editorials that helped beat back a legislative attack on California’s Public Records Act. He also produced a string of columns critical of school districts that failed to report suspicious behavior and he challenged the lack of disclosure during BART labor negotiations. 


The awards banquet will be held at the City Club of San Francisco, 155 Sansome Street, 9th floor, 1½ blocks from the Montgomery St. BART station. A no-host reception at 5:30 pm will be followed at 6:30pmby the dinner and awards ceremony.  Tickets are $50 for SPJ members and students, and $70 for other attendees.  Full table hosting opportunities and program sponsorships are also available.


To purchase tickets please go to

The James Madison Freedom of Information Award is named for the creative force behind the First Amendment and honors local journalists, organizations, public officials, educators and private citizens who have fought for public access to government meetings and records and promoted the public’s right to know and freedom of expression. The awards dinner is held annually during the week of Madison’s birthday, which was March 16, 1751.


Award winners are selected by SPJ NorCal’s Freedom of Information Committee.


Background information, including a complete list and description of winners is attached.  Additional information is available from FOI Committee co-chairs Thomas Peele or Geoffrey King at the email addresses listed above.








Peter Sussman has spent most of his career as a vocal advocate for journalistic ethics and freedom of information, and as an editor for the San Francisco Chronicle. But he is perhaps best known for his dogged advocacy for news media access to prisoners and as an advocate for prisoners’ right to practice journalism. He began pushing for media access to inmates when federal prison officials punished convicted bank robber Dannie “Red Hog” Martin for writing to Sussman in the 1980s. It began an epic fight for freedom of speech, and from 1986 to 1992 the Chronicle, with Sussman as his editor, published Martin’s articles about prison life. Sussman co-authored a book with Martin, “Committing Journalism: The Prison Writings of Red Hog.” During his stint as SPJ chapter president from 1995-1997, state prison officials issued “emergency” restrictions on media interviews with prisoners. During the ensuing national media attention, Sussman became the natural spokesman on the issue.  For years after that he helped write and sponsor bills in Sacramento that would overturn the media access limits.  He also helped to write the SPJ Code of Ethics.  And in his spare time he edited “Decca,” a collection of letters by Jessica Mitford, muckraking journalist and memoirist.




Rob Gunnison spent two decades as a journalist for United Press International and the San Francisco Chronicle, giving him the kind of hands-on experience journalism students covet. Gunnison taught at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism from 1999 to 2013, mentoring dozens of students in the realities of news gathering. In the years before he left, Gunnison also served as the Director of School Affairs. He guided the school through trying periods of transition and pushed to reinstate requirements that students understand and are able to use public records laws. He has been an outstanding influence to aspiring journalists with his passion for reporting, his humility and approachability. He instilled optimism in the face of a rapidly shifting and often hostile media climate.




Peter Buxton played a historic role as a whistleblower in 1972 by exposing the decades-long experimentation on the effects of untreated syphilis on hundreds of African-American sharecroppers. Although penicillin was a proven cure for syphilis, for 40 years, the government allowed the men to suffer and die, and to expose their wives and children to the disease, and left it untreated to monitor its course. As a young venereal disease researcher for the U.S. Public Health Service in Alabama, Buxton met with doctors and tried to force the issue of treatment, only to be mocked and refused.  He left the service for the UC Hastings School of Law but, haunted by the plight of the men, he reached out to a journalist about the government’s experiment. As a result of his action, Congress reformed laws on human research, Medical Ethics Committees were required to have non-physician members and the victims were given $10 million in reparations.  In 1997 President Bill Clinton apologized to the victims and their survivors:  “The United States Government did something that was profoundly, morally wrong… clearly racist.”




Reporter Tom Vacar of KTVU Channel 2 pursued a critical safety story at the height of the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) strike in 2013: Were substitute drivers, drawn from supervisor ranks, qualified to operate the trains? BART and the union told him the California Public Utilities Commission certified the train operators. But he was stonewalled when he asked the CPUC to explain how it certified operators. It was not until Vacar pressed for documentation, using the state Public Records Act, that he learned BART provided no more than a rubber stamp for drivers. He exposed the false claims of certification, showing the CPUC did not certify, review, test or train operators. In fact, after two BART workers were killed on the tracks by a passing train, he discovered the CPUC did not even have copies of training materials.




Despite the risk of infuriating his own Democratic party leadership and Governor Jerry Brown, Senator Leland Yee of San Francisco spoke out early against the governor’s plan to weaken the California Public Records Act. A proposal, slipped into the 2013-2014 state budget would have allowed the open records law to be essentially optional for cities and other local agencies. Yee became the lone Democrat in the state Legislature to cry foul early. With public sentiment on his side, Yee ultimately prevailed. The governor and the legislature backed away from the plan when faced with a flood of opposition from newspaper editorials, environmentalists and conservatives.  




Freelance journalist Richard Knee has been a fixture on the SPJ NorCal’s FOI Committee for more than two decades. He played a major role in the successful effort to strengthen San Francisco’s Sunshine Ordinance in 1998-99. And since 2002 he has served on the city’s Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, an 11-member body that monitors how well (or poorly) City Hall complies with local and state open-government laws. He has not been afraid to lock horns with powerful politicians suspected of sunshine-law violations, including former Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin and current Supervisor Scott Wiener.




Lake County News co-founder Elizabeth Larson first confronted a candidate for sheriff, Frank Rivero, in 2010, with evidence of his arrest record in Florida. When Rivero won the election, Larson learned he was under investigation for changing a story about shooting a man in 2008 while working as a deputy.  His credibility was so undermined from the shooting statements that Rivero could not testify in court, without defendants being informed of his history under a legal precedent called the Brady rule. When Larson used the open-records law to expose Rivero’s status as a Brady violation risk, he retaliated by blacklisting the Lake County News from routine media information. Larson and her husband, John Jensen, took Rivero to court and in March 2013, with the help of attorney Paul Boylan of Davis, they won restoration of access to public media information and the county had to pay $110,000 to cover the pair’s legal fees.




Samuel Liu, Sabrina Chen and Cristina Curcelli, reporters for Saratoga High School’s The Saratoga Falcon, questioned the accuracy of news accounts that attributed the tragic suicide of a schoolmate to virulent cyberbullying by fellow students. National headlines said students passed around photos of an alleged sexual assault on the girl during a party. Liu, Chen and Curcelli wanted to discover what was accurate. They interviewed more than 50 people, some on condition of anonymity. In sharp contrast to the national headlines, they reported “roughly 10 people” saw the illicit photos and they “never went on Facebook.” But on the first day back to school in 2013 the three were handed subpoenas demanding their emails, notes and names of sources from a lawyer for the girl’s family, which was suing the school. All three successfully resisted the subpoenas by invoking California’s reporter Shield Law. In so doing, they highlighted that the Shield Law is for all journalists, not just those working for pay. Guylyn Cummins, lawyer for the students, pointed out the Shield Law applies to student journalists, who do not lose their constitutional rights when they step onto campus.




Rebecca Bowe, San Francisco Bay Guardian news editor, and staff writer Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez used public records, interviews and independent research to probe how developers, corporations and city contractors use indirect gifts to city agencies to buy influence. Their investigation found that donations are not made directly to regulators where disclosure laws would leave them easily tracked. Instead, millions of dollars are funneled through private nonprofits, sometimes dubbed “Friends of” committees, such as Friends of City Planning or Friends of Animal Care and Control. Bowe and Rodriguez found that a mechanism allows large amounts of cash to flow in shadowy donations that make it difficult to see who is behind the money. Their detailed and thorough account explored a trail of money through myriad city agencies and departments.




The San Quentin News has accomplished extraordinary journalism under extraordinary circumstances.  It is the only inmate-produced newspaper in California, begun in 1940 by warden Clinton Duffy. These prison reporters, along with volunteers from the outside, raise the curtain of secrecy that shrouds those who live behind the walls. Although under the scrutiny of prison authorities, they reported on last year’s prisoners’ hunger strike, prison overcrowding, the controversial handling of a deadly Valley Fever outbreak in the prisons and a feature on the refusal of a Superior Court judge to grant compassionate release to an 81-year-old inmate dying of cancer. They handle reporting with tenacity, sensitivity and thoroughness.




Judith Liteky, a former nun, and Theresa Cameranesi, sued in federal court in San Francisco to gain public release of the names of students and instructors at the U.S. military school known for its role in training military officers later linked to human rights abuses. Liteky was a founding member of the non-profit School of Americas Watch, formed after the 1990 murder of six priests and their housekeeper and her daughter in San Salvador. The massacre was linked to 19 Salvadoran military officers trained at the former U.S. Army School of the Americas. The two women sued the Department of Defense to force resumption of what had been routine release of student names. In 2013 they won a significant victory. An Oakland federal judge, in a precedent-setting decision, ruled the government could not withhold the names on a national security basis. Although the legal fight is not over, this ruling alone curbs the government’s ability to restrict access to internationally sensitive information.




Attorney Terry Gross of Gross Belsky Alonso, in San Francisco, has spent years working to expand the rights of online journalists, to vindicate reporters wrongly arrested during protests and to protect reporters whose phone records were subject to corporate snooping. Last year, Gross secured a $99,000 settlement for photojournalist Jane Tyska after former Oakland Unified School District Police Chief Art Michel detained her while she covered a protest. In 2012, he won a $162,500 settlement and restraining order against the UC Berkeley Police Department for the illegal arrest and search of a camera belonging to Indybay journalist David Morse during a 2009 protest. Gross successfully represented Think Secret in a landmark state appeal court decision that extended California’s journalist Shield Law to online-only publications. In 2008, he sought damages on behalf of The New York Times and several Business Week journalists from Hewlett-Packard, after it was discovered HP obtained the private telephone records of reporters in an attempt to discover a news source from unpublished material.




Aaron Swartz was, by all accounts, a brilliant and sophisticated young man. Although he died in January 2013 at the age of 26, his work on the journalist-source software “Strongbox” flourished. “Strongbox” — now renamed “SecureDrop” — promises to be a crucial tool for journalists and their sources in the wake of revelations about mass surveillance by the National Security Agency. “Strongbox/SecureDrop” provides a secure system for sources and journalists to receive documents and communicate with each other confidentially in the digital age. Swartz initially conceived of “Strongbox” in San Francisco, where he lived at the time. The New Yorker adopted the secure document submission system in May and it has now been adopted by such publications as Forbes, The Global Mail and ProPublica. At the time of his death, Swartz was under federal indictment for downloading a large number of academic papers via MIT's network, which he reportedly intended to distribute. He could have been sentenced to as many as 50 years in prison if convicted and many have attributed to his tragic taking of his own life to the government pressure he faced.




Senior investigative reporter Charles Piller of The Sacramento Bee pored over more than 100,000 pages of construction and inspection records to make a troubling discovery: Tendons on the new eastern span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge were subject to water-induced corrosion. He broke the story that a comparison of inspection records and a rosy report by the California Department of Transportation showed CalTrans found few significant problems and that its report was littered with misstatements and wrong information. His relentless digging uncovered the failure of CalTrans to protect the “post-tension” tendons on the new spans skyway from water and that the bridge construction violated universally accepted techniques meant to prevent corrosion. He was also able to report that inspectors had warned for at least two years about water leaks and potential corrosion.




Columnist and editorial writer Daniel Borenstein of the Bay Area News Group helped beat back a 2013 attack by Governor Jerry Brown and the California Legislature on the California Public Records Act. Borenstein sounded the first alarm in his columns and kept up the attack. He also directly challenged a stonewalling school district attorney over access to documents, including the lawyer’s withholding of his own job contract renewal. This led the district to release them and fire the attorney. His tenacity in seeking out and monitoring of Bay Area Rapid Transit District paperwork during the BART administration’s months-long duel with unions over contract terms prompted him to call for more transparency and disclosure in a series of editorials. Lastly, he pushed for, and obtained, release of documents related to teacher abuse of students in local school districts, which enabled his colleagues to put together stories about the failure of local districts to report suspicious behavior to authorities as required by law.



No, really. Yawn.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 13, 2014 @ 2:38 pm

Either that or a close contact. The only other option is you love corruption (while not benefiting from it) but that would make you insane or stupid. So you're either scum by intention or sticking up for scum because you're mentally ill.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 12:35 am

The bar isn't set very high for politicians.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 9:33 am

I find it hard to believe that not many voters care about "the shady ways that developers and other powerful players buy influence at City Hall." What you're saying is most post ppl don't care about corruption - what makes you think that??? Where's your evidence for that?

What you're really saying is most ppl are stupid or ignorant because one would have to be stupid or ignorant to not care about corruption, for the level of corruption is an indicator of how effective the government is.

You see clearly the effects of corruption the higher the level of govt you go. For instance, the more corrupt a national govt is, the lower the quality of life, education, health, etc of the ppl of such a country. On a state level, the level of corruption by the governor and state govt of North Carolina in not cracking down on Duke Energy has just resulted in massive pollution of North Carolinians' drinking water for which many will probably die or get badly sick. It might not be so noticeable on a city level but I would take a bet that most ppl (at least voters) care deeply about corruption.

The problem is that rarely is corruption uncovered so when the BG or any other media outlet exposes it, they should be praised and thanked for they are doing a valuable service for the ppl of that area instead of being jeered like you and the OP did.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 11:32 pm

vote differently. Corrupt mayors like Brown and Newsom got re-elected so it's impossible to argue that voters care.

If I had to guess, I'd say that the voters want new development and understand that, with NIMBYism the way it is, a few corners have to be cut in order to build anything

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 9:57 am

See a certain governor in the state of NJ for a demo of this. As for Brown, as I recall every supe that was aligned with him in his last term was defeated. Brown himself was guaranteed a high % of the black vote otherwise he would've been defeated (nor ever elected).

The problem is that most ppl get their news from tv and anyone who relies on tv for their news is uninformed except for knowledge about the shooting last night in Oakland, the weather for the next 24 hours and who won the Giants game. So praise should be given to the BG and similar publications that, unlike tv news (and the Chron except in rare instances) reveal corruption.

Good job Bay Guardian!

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 3:50 pm

You are fighting a losing battle.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 5:42 pm

"Brown himself was guaranteed a high % of the black vote otherwise he would've been defeated (nor ever elected)." You could probably switch "Brown" for "Obama" and it'd be true too. But that'd be racist, right?

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 6:26 pm

Technically it is racist that one person gives a nod to some degree to someone of his or her own race but it's human nature and as long as there are different races, it will be probably true to *some* degree for a large % of the ppl of a race (with higher %s in races that have been discriminated against in the recent past).

In the case of the African American vote, they deserve a pass in that election (and in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections) for a higher % of them voting for an African-American considering how long they were shut out of the process and for how long the system was against them. As time goes on, I suspect the % of them voting on the basis of race being an important factor in their vote will go down on a steady basis.

But the point is the fact that Brown was re-elected didn't mean ppl weren't bothered by his corrupt administration or any other corrupt administration. Sometimes other factors trump corruption but it's not a winning issue since people in general don't want their politicians to be corrupt so the BG deserves praise for exposing corruption.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 8:13 pm

Going by your logic then progressives shouldn't complain when gays vote for people like Scott Wiener based on his policies rather than the fact that he's gay. Or that gays or Latinos vote for Chiu over Campos because they agree with his political leanings rather than his sexual orientation/ethnicity.

And BTW I do actually agree that people have a tendency to vote their skin color. It's just a natural fact of life that most people will identify with people who look like you/dress like you/talk like you/are in the same profession as you are. What I didn't like was when the poster made it seem as if there was a populist vote against Willie Brown and that he only was reelected because of the black vote. The point I was trying to make was that you could say the exact same thing about Obama, but the poster would never make the connection because he likes Obama and hates Brown.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 8:28 pm

"Going by your logic then progressives shouldn't complain when gays vote for people like Scott Wiener based on his policies rather than the fact that he's gay. Or that gays or Latinos vote for Chiu over Campos because they agree with his political leanings rather than his sexual orientation/ethnicity."

I'm a progressive and I agree with that.

"What I didn't like was when the poster made it seem as if there was a populist vote against Willie Brown and that he only was reelected because of the black vote. The point I was trying to make was that you could say the exact same thing about Obama, but the poster would never make the connection because he likes Obama and hates Brown."

There was a populist vote against Brown. Proof of that is that every supe aligned with him lost his or her re-election in Brown's second term. Brown won re-election (I believe) because he got most of the African-American (AA) vote while his supe allies didn't. Without the strong AA vote, I think he would've lost (just like his supe allies did).

As for Obama, I agree with you that, like Brown, he probably wouldn't have won if not for the AA vote. The difference is that there's no significant amount of evidence of corruption on the part of Obama that has reached the mainstream media (like it did with Willie - for example, opening elections the weekend before the general election in only Hunters Point - the area he had the most support) nor is there evidence that politicians aligned with him were defeated (like Brown's supe allies were) because of their tie to him with that tie being poisonous because of a general belief he is corrupt (as was the case with Willie) - no evidence of any of that. The only thing in common is that both received a very high % of the AA vote - a % that I agree was probably crucial in both cases.

As I said, with time, the corruption factor will be more important to AA voters than the race factor. But when Willie won re-election, that wasn't the case (unfortunately for his supe allies, they didn't have the race factor working for them and they did pay the price for the corruption factor).

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 10:14 pm

I have to disagree with your emphasis on the "corruption" factor. People are willing to accept corruption as long as it furthers their interests. And corruption is a matter of perspective. If I,as a conservative, take money from "downtown interests" to fund my campaign, am I corrupt? If I, as a progressive, take money (and votes) from SEIU, am I corrupt?

Right/left, religious/atheist, pro-union/non-union, it doesn't matter. As screwed up as it sounds, people will vote for their own best interests. That's why the majority of this country votes for the country will vote their own economic interests above all. Social issues will ALWAYS be secondary to personal economic issues. I think the proof of it is in that Newsom and Lee were elected and reelected. As a conservative, I disagree with gay marriage but I voted for Newsom because he was more pro-business than Gonzalez was.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 10:45 pm

The AA vote is what, 5-6% of the total? Let's err to the point of absurdity and say that Brown got 100% of the AA vote, and would've gotten 0% if he wasn't AA. That's a *maximum* possible swing of 12%. He would've still won by 6-7 points. Of course the actual effect of the AA identity vote was much less than the max possible swing.

What really happened was that the deleterious effects of the dot com bubble hadn't yet come to a head in 1999, when Brown ran for re-election. But by late 2000 when the supes were running, it did.

And that's what precisely what we're seeing now. Campos may well be correct about the progressive resurgence. Lee skated by in 2011. But now, the affordability crisis is hitting a peak. People are getting evicted through Ellis, rents are through the roof, and the only people who can afford the city seem to be obnoxious and clueless 25-year old techies willing to pay top dollar for cages in one of the techie-kennels popping up all over the city and devastating the landscape. Multimillionaire developers are making bank off the money of millionaires, and everybody else is suffering.

And everybody else is pissed. People are angry, frustrated, and afraid. That's why 2014 and 2015 could be a very different electoral environment than 2011.

Posted by Greg on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 10:46 pm

don't have to adhere to the cities lobbyist law?

Posted by guest on Feb. 13, 2014 @ 8:18 pm

For their efforts, the SFBG was awarded 2 tickets to Burning Man 2014. Second prize was 4 tickets.

Posted by Chromefields on Feb. 14, 2014 @ 8:40 am

Steven T. Jones doing his version of Fidel Castro exhorting the masses.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 14, 2014 @ 8:54 am

Too bad there's no way to just filter the trolls like guest here and the garbage that dummies like him excretes.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 12:43 am
Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 9:34 am

Leftists want to censor everyone who disagrees with them.

Wit just makes it worse.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 10:15 am

Where is the evidence of hubris? In fact most of the article is devoted to non-BG winners. The article is about journalists - most of whom aren't BG - who will receive awards for good work.

If you really really really hate the BG so much - and you definitely do if you can stretch the definition of hubris as you did, it might be good for your health to hang out at Faux News or Newsmax or something like that that's more along the twisted ways you think.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 11:39 pm
Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 9:49 am

for a job well done. Respect from their peers - an experience you will never have Mr. Trollfields.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 12:39 am

polish your knob all you want you fucking fired people like Savannah Blackwell who had way more experience than your sorry ass because you don't like it when anyone without a penis is in the newsroom.

Fitz is a nice guy but he's a child. compared to the many women your paper fired he's at best an intern. fuck you and fuck your sexist bullshit, asshole!

Posted by Guest on Feb. 14, 2014 @ 11:37 am

who are you even talking to? Savannah left for another job more than a decade ago. And the co-author of the prize-winning piece is Rebecca Bowe.

Posted by admin on Feb. 14, 2014 @ 2:36 pm

Did you forget to take your meds again?

Posted by Guest on Feb. 14, 2014 @ 5:06 pm

And ignore this worthless piece of shit so he or she can crawl back under the pile of dogshit he or she came from.

Once again good job Bay Guardian and thanks for the excellent journalism for your readers!

Posted by Guest on Feb. 16, 2014 @ 12:49 am

We really need such investigation here in the City of New York particularly in Kings County and Manhattan. We have certain attorneys who get whatever he/she wants One attorney it was claimed brought a seat in Manhattan. But he won in court which was expected. How does an attorney influence the judicial system so much that he/she gets what he/she wants in almost every challenge case? How does an attorney have so much influence in the judicial system that other attorneys are afraid to challenge him/her?

Posted by Guest Just a reader on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 2:42 pm

Great job. Keep up the god work.

Posted by Guest Just a reader on Feb. 17, 2014 @ 2:44 pm

hey! thanks for nice share! I'm working as web designer for Minneapolis web design firm. nice to check out your blog.

Posted by MN Designers on Feb. 20, 2014 @ 10:21 pm

A big thanks to all the creative people who share their content with the world!

Posted by Build My Gaming PC on Apr. 07, 2014 @ 4:08 am

A big thanks to all the creative people who share their content with the world!

Posted by Calgary Family Lawyer on May. 28, 2014 @ 5:42 am

Why oh Why did I just read that?

Posted by Aaron Krowne on Jun. 04, 2014 @ 3:56 am

Why did i just read this and write that?

Posted by Aaron Krowne on Jun. 04, 2014 @ 3:57 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Also from this author